Under these forms of reader-response criticism such a reading can be considered "valid". In the case of Free! a "reader" can look at the "interactions" of the teammates and assign them the meaning of "sexual" and/or "romantic" "attraction". As opposed to a text having an inherent meaning independent of outside forces. In some forms of reader-response criticism a "reader" "interprets" a "text" and adds "meaning" to it. The "gay" controversy surrounding this is a result of fujoshi hype and wailing combined with people mistaking man-service for yaoi.Įven though this topic looks like it's just a means to accuse people of being homophobic, under SOME schools of literary criticism this is actually correct.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |